IMHO, the situation is simply obvious. The people of Massachussetts must define homosexuality as immoral sexual behavior, outlaw such behavior, then deal with those who advance homosexuality as the sexually immoral persons they have become. Their communication of such pornography and promoting illicit behavior is then dealt with accordingly by law enforcement.
Until this happens, the people of that state will simply suffer the consequences of living in a community that rejects such laws. Their society will begin to degenerate and many blessings they would have received had they been moral and righteous will be turned into cursings, lasting perhaps through multiple generations.
IMHO, it's their business and between them and God. Indubitably, the advancement of homosexuality is inappropriate. Also inappropriate is a Christian crusade to do good and intervene in the decisions of others within their proper domains. IMHO, God doesn't need my assistance in dealing with immorally degenerate people and societies such as those in Massachssetts.
Out of curiousity, I wonder if they used this photo on their handouts:
***IMHO, most of the people of Massachusetts, that is taxpayers, parents and responsible citizens, do object to the sex orientation and homosexual promotion in the public schools' curricula. The people do not have adequate recourse!
Who is the guy in the photo?
I agree the PEOPLE have to assume the initiative. The wise ones are leaving the state.
Tom Hanks playing the homosexual with AIDS in the film, 'Philadelphia'.