In point of fact, NYC's Marymount-Manhattan had been "de-listed" a long time ago but crawled back into the listings, perhaps by accident.
Nobody paid any attention until the recent brou-ha-ha--
But Marymount-Manhattan had "declared its independence" and really could care less what the Archdiocese of New York says or does.
Besides which, (if you haven't figured this out already) Cdl. Egan is regarded by those who know him as a superb politician--thus to the larger point: the election of B-16 is causing a great deal of sycophancy-reaction from certain Bishops and Cardinals who could have cared LESS until B-16 was elected.
Short version: hypocrites.
You've given me some news and some confusing details.
I didn't know Marymount had been previously delisted. I never read that in the story earlier.
I am not concerned about what Marymount thinks but rather what parents sending their children to Marymount and the children themselves might think on attending Marymount. Same goes for Loyola.
Are you saying the difference in treatment of the two colleges stems from the fact that Cardinal Egan is a sycophant
but Cardinal Keeler is not? Or were there other more substantial academic reasons that Marymount, to this point, is receiving harsher treatment?