I have looked into a lot of the theories and theorists behind 911 complicity and many are right wing, or conservative. Many libertarians we well. Some Leftists, true, but you couldn't say it is a left-wing thing. In fact, many of the far-left liberals from the Nation to the Progressive to Democracy Now refuse to look at 911 as an inside-job conspiracy, and actively debunk such theories. They prefer to attack Bush/Cheney/Rummy on the opportunities presented in the aftermath of 911. However, I think David Ray Griffin's appearance on CSPAN a few weekends ago has raised a lot more interest in the subject - and he is a fairly moderate theologian, non-partisan, looking for bi-partisan unity. Most of the 911 investigations I have come across put Clinton and Bush together in the same game, behind the scenes. And we aren't naive enough to think there is no 'behind the scenes' now are we?
A corollary to Metcalfe's Law is that the difficulty of keeping a conspiracy secret increases in proportion to the square of the number of conspirators.
Anybody who believes in a massive worldwide conspiracy along the lines of the Elders of Zion is a fool. Unfortunately, that includes a lot of otherwise sensible and respectable people on the Right.
-ccm