Posted on 05/18/2005 3:00:25 PM PDT by Nascardude
There's a difference?
If I was Coors, I would have this guy in my beer commerical tomorrow. He would be more famous than Jarred, the guy who eats subs and loses weight.
Most people are fired because they're screw-ups. The "I was fired because my boss is an intolerant bigot" stuff comes later.
This is EXACTLY WHY I only drink Miller Lite.
It tatses great.
Wow. I still feel guilty drinking Bud while wearing my Miller Lite #2 hat.
No, it's less filling...
Tastes great!
Less filling!
This story is two weeks old.
If you just did a simple search on "Budweiser" you would have seen it was posted before.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1405929/posts
The beverage industry is insanely competitive. Brand loyalty is a big deal, and this guy knew or should have known that. Soft drink distributors are even more cutthroat. If you work for Coca Cola you can get fired for even being IN a Pepsi establisment, so I'm told.
It's all a game, though. A pal's sister used to be a marketing rep for Budweiser, then quit to go to work for Heineken. Literally overnight she went from rabidly pro-Bud to being equally rabidly pro-Heineken.
Ohhh Cry me a freakin river why don'y you
I was the one who posted this a week or so ago. That link takes you to this very same article. If it's been posted before, the moderator will remove it. Next time look at the date of the original post before you lecture me on posting procedures, genuis.
An employer has the right to fire any employee at any time for any reason, IMO. I completely disagree with the prevailing attitude that a job is a right. A job should be an agreement which the employer or employee may terminate at will. It makes no more sense to complain about an employer terminating an employee than for an employer to complain about an employee quitting. Neither should necessarily carry the stigma currently attached either.
If you're the one who already posted it once before, then I'm afraid you're the one vying for the "genius" title. What were you trying to accomplish by posting it again?
FOR THE LOVE OF GOD!!! Look at the link in post 11. It takes you to this very same thread. I didn't repost the same story, I POSTED THE ORIGINAL FREAKING THREAD WHICH IS WHAT THIS IS. I didn't repost this story today.
>>>Posted on 05/18/2005 3:00:25 PM PDT by Nascardude<<<
That's 5/18/2005 that I posted this story. Not today, and not a repeat of the same story.
>>>Posted on 05/18/2005 3:00:25 PM PDT by Nascardude<<<
That's 5/18/2005 that I posted this story. Not today, and not a repeat of the same story.
Man, you have a problem with repeating yourself. Just look at how many times you've used the word "post". Its sad, really. ;-) </chainyank>
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.