Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: antiRepublicrat
Copyright law doesn't say anything about that.

Yes, exactly. Thank you. So when you said "the copyright holder orally waived his right to sue for copyright infringement," that was completely off-base, wasn't it? In truth, because copyright law does not speak to taking North America-only software out of North America, Bill can't possibly have been waiving his right to sue me for copyright infringment - there is no infringement inherent in such an act, and thus there is no cause of action for a copyright suit. Therefore, the only thing he could possibly have been waiving was his right to revoke my license. QED.

131 posted on 05/25/2005 7:03:11 PM PDT by general_re ("Frantic orthodoxy is never rooted in faith, but in doubt." - Reinhold Niebuhr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]


To: general_re
So when you said "the copyright holder orally waived his right to sue for copyright infringement," that was completely off-base, wasn't it?

No, it wasn't.

In truth, because copyright law does not speak to taking North America-only software out of North America, Bill can't possibly have been waiving his right to sue me for copyright infringment - there is no infringement inherent in such an act,

Yes there is, because he put a reflection of the ITAR regulations in the license. There would be no copyright issue if the license didn't mention where you could use the software. But it does, so there is.

132 posted on 05/26/2005 6:14:35 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson