The tribe said that all of Churchill's "past, present and future claims or assertions of Keetoowah 'enrollment,' written or spoken, including but not limited to; biographies, curriculum vitae, lectures, applications for employment, or any other reference not listed herein, are deemed fraudulent by the United Keetoowah Band."
But wait!! It COULD have been true if only Churchill's parents or grandparents had been members of the tribe. So the ESSENCE of his claim is correct, although it can't be substantiated by facts. Nevertheless, his claim shouldn't be discounted just because the tribe says this because, fundamentally, Churchill COULD have been an indian so the fact that he SAYS he is an indian shouldn't just be tossed aside because some indians say he isn't..........
Just wanted to get a jump on the MSM and liberal response.
They need to prepare their response to "Churchill fired by CU Regents", citing lying on his application of tenureship, to: he's not an Indian, and he plagerized paintings done by others. Sound like a liberal?