Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Publius Valerius

Spend some time in Amesterdam and tell me if you have the same opinion about legalized drugs. On the criminal law issue, sure the federal government has expanded way beyond what the framers could have imagined, but they did have federal criminal law, even back in the days of Jefferson.


170 posted on 05/19/2005 11:53:13 AM PDT by NavVet (“Benedict Arnold was wounded in battle fighting for America, but no one remembers him for that.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]


To: NavVet
I said just about all; there are certain crimes that the United States has constitutional power to prosecute, but they are mighty few and far between.

So like I said, I remain consistent. Show me something the FBI is doing, and unless it's punishing counterfeiting or something of the sort, chances are that I'll be opposed to it.
171 posted on 05/19/2005 12:00:15 PM PDT by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]

To: NavVet

I will say, additionally, I don't think the intent of the commerce clause was to give Congress a hook on which to hang federal law.

However, I think that sometimes you simply have to cede to history--Congress has been doing it for too long to upset the apple cart at this point. I think, however, its powers to define criminal law under the commerce clause should be strict and narrow. No laws against handguns on school grounds or violence against women statutes, for instance.


172 posted on 05/19/2005 12:05:44 PM PDT by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson