Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mbraynard
Yeah, I'll stick with "nutcase" and "fatass" because you're positions aren't really even that out of the mainstream, but you personally are anti-social, lazy, and stupid.

.....says the discussion board tough guy hiding behind his computer screen as he insults anyone who doesn't agree with him. Actually, I guess I should be impressed at your obvious psychological prowess since only a true genius could identify me as being anti-social based on a couple of posts here. I suggest you look in the mirror before opening your mouth about something like this again.

The rest of your lecturing is short on sense and principle and long on relativism. Have fun on your judgement day explaining why you choose to actively support, through your vote, people who contribute to the advance of immoral socialistic principles. Because I don't think that the "they were the lesser of two evils" arguement will work, especially when there ARE other candidates in other parties to choose from.

.The reason why things seldom change for the better, and leftist ideals have gained more and more ground, is because of people like you who are so brainwashed into thinking that things can only change through the republican party. The problem, sir, is that you ignore any other group or party that isn't willing to toe the party line, and THAT is what is stupid here.

And you wonder why you don't like the direction the R party is going in? MAybe it's because fatass nutcases (this means you) have decided not to be involved anymore and are looking for an easy but irrelevant choice rather than a hard, meaningful one.

So I am a "fatass nutcase" because I have the nerve not to support a party that is becoming democrats-lite. Was Ronald Reagan a fatass nutcase too? After all, the democratic party's policies strayed far from what he believed and he left them instead of changing their direction. I guess then, using your logic, Reagan was "looking for an easy but irrelevant choice rather than a hard, meaningful one".

I have nothing more to say to you on this subject since your insults and condescension when met with any disagreements about fundamental Constitutional rights, like who to vote for, show you to be nothing more than a childish troll. If you want to insult people who disagree with your toe-the-party-line mentality than you might want to check out DU.

39 posted on 05/20/2005 1:28:58 PM PDT by frankiep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: frankiep

You may as well try to push your efforts through the Democrat party if you think it enhances your chances of getting results.

Funny you mention Reagan. He didn't sit on his hands or waste his time with an irrelevant 3rd party. He moved to the Republican party and worked within that aparatus.

You don't like the party's candidates? Who do you think chooses them? Your neighbors. But you think you are too good to go over and talk to them about electing a conservative PRECINCT captain. You can't even do that so what makes you think you can get any RESULTS.

The reality is you don't care about conservative policies or changing this nation or this world. You are more concerned with your own death and dying 'pure' because you never got your hands dirty within party politics to actually make a difference in this world.


40 posted on 05/20/2005 3:07:32 PM PDT by mbraynard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson