what's with the BUSH Prosecutor crap anyway???Looks like the fix is in...TWICE!
This is stunning. Why would a prosecutor not introduce a tape that is his most compelling evidence. It is damaging as an 'admission against interest' IMHO.
The fix is in. Investigate the prosecutor.
My take/questions: Putting aside the shock of the move, why? Moreso, why is a Clinton appointee judge seeming to want to get the tape in? There's a lot more here than meets the eye...
One aspect of this story I never see is that if Rosen is found guilty, doesn't that make Hillary Clinton guilty as well?... of receiving stolen property?
Receiving stolen property is a crime whether or not you knew the stuff was stolen when you received it.
Oh yes, does'nt this make you want to to donate your time and money to the GOP campaign in 2006 or what?
Sounds like Hellery has some tapes too...and someone knows that she'll use them if she has to. Obviously, the Justice Dept. is no match for that cut-throat schemer when even the Clintoon judge, who declared her innocent before the trial opened, can't believe his ears when they throw the case. Truly stinky.
what's with the BUSH Prosecutor crap anyway???this Hillman needs to go - public integrity?
Next thing ya know he'll be allowing Puerto Rican murder bombers to be free to any caring home except his...
This stinks.
Looks to me like the Bushs are setting the stage for a Hillary Presidency.
Char
Something just isn't right here. Hillary is not to be embarrassed about anything or accout for any wrong doing on her part? Sandy Berger is let off after filching/stealing highly sensitive documents from the National Archives? Nor do I believe GWB or Jeb would call Bill Clinton Bro - I have to hear that from their own mouths to believe it! Soneone is pulling our legs..........
While the informant's work for the FBI on Mr. Rosen's case dates back to 2002, the agency continued to work closely with the witness through the end of 2004, court documents indicate. The November 2004 filing indicates the FBI was planning to use the informant in an investigation of "a prominent political figure who may be involved in illegally soliciting foreign nationals to contribute to national political campaigns." The target of the inquiry was suspected of "funneling illegal campaign contributions from foreign nationals to individuals running for federal office."
There is no indication in the documents whether the "prominent political figure" who may have been soliciting illegal gifts from foreigners is the same person to whom the informant is related.
The same unidentified informant was also being asked to record phone calls with targets of an investigation into alleged political corruption in Louisiana, the court filing late last year said. That scheme involved a state senator and a "fraudulent contract worth five million dollars," prosecutors asserted.
Also of interest is the fact that I cannot find a bio on this prosecutor anywhere. Is he really a "Bush prosecutor" or was he appointed by someone else? If we could find that info, it would shed some light on his agenda.