Why do you assume that? Why? THIS IS WHAT THE WHOLE LEGAL CASE WAS ABOUT. Don't you get it? It was proven in a court of law that this was not her wish. I know, I know you don't like it. But the law was followed.
A fishy, belated story was bought by a death minded judge. All else was procedural wrangling that went nowhere. What was "proven" mattered not, what His Greerness believed to be a fact did matter. No court of appeal had power to touch that -- it's the way the system is built for better or for worse -- this time MARKEDLY for the worse.