Posted on 05/18/2005 6:01:54 AM PDT by NYer
In a way, yes. And while we're on it, where did I say there was anything wrong with profiting from it? I was merely pointing out that they were the first to do it.
Bahahaha!!! You really are a troll, aren't you? Just here to fan the flames. I've seen you do it on other threads.
The reason a dog has so many friends is that he wags his tail instead of his tongue
You might want to follow your own tagline's advice.
Maybe the Pope could ask Michael S. or his lawyer where Terri's ashes are.
The way the Schlinders have treated Michael, and the names he has been labeled with, i.e. murderer...I don't blame him for keeping her ashes from them. Nothing he does will ever redeem himself in their eyes. Why bother?
Or maybe he's doing them all a big favor. They'd only make a shrine out of her marker. Not healthy.
sw
Amen
Mike's a big, tough guy. He can take it.
You know this thing about her ashes is the same thing they've (Schindler's) done through out this whole case. Make an accusation and keep it up even though it's either been explained or refutiated. Michael still has the ashes. He has not decided what to do with them. He said when he does, he'll let them know. But that's not got enough, because nothing will ever be good enough for them. I don't blame him either. After all the things they've accused him of I'd only do what absolutely forced on my to do (courts).
I make comments about the subject and all I get in return is personal attacks. Since you find it so amusing, show me where I said there was something wrong with profiting from it?
So you really need to push that knife in deeply, Hildy, must be hard for you to get enough. Then again, with maybe one or two most excellent twists of that sharp blade you wield so deftly, and you will be finally satisfied. Forever. That would be a relief for many of us.`
I think the truth is a variation of what you just said.
Good GAWD lady, they are CATHOLICS, don't you think that as such, meeting the Pope would matter more than any picture of the meeting that they could sell (or maybe, give away for free)?
What are you talking about? Why do you guys take criticism about this issue so personally? I've never seen anything like it in all my year's on FR.
Who said anything about "selling" pictures. I just wondered who paid for the trip. That's all.
There are reports that there was an understanding that Mr. Jackpot Winner would reimburse the Schindlers for the care of Terri that they administered before he saw a dime. An understanding that conveniently fell apart when he actually did get the dimes.
They have lots of donors. What, you jealous?
Donors? What do you mean, donors?
So you're saying that the Schindler's were retaliating because of money. Looks like we agree.
What, you jealous?
A fishy, belated story was bought by a death minded judge. All else was procedural wrangling that went nowhere. What was "proven" mattered not, what His Greerness believed to be a fact did matter. No court of appeal had power to touch that -- it's the way the system is built for better or for worse -- this time MARKEDLY for the worse.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.