It's not a matter of 'turning'on anyone - Frist (and Hastert, and Lott, and McCain, and ....) have proven by their (lack of) performance - a complete inability to provide strong leadership in the Congress. They have failed to get the support the President needs/needed to get more than a handful of his programs launched. The fault has also to be shared by Bush himself - who spent more time pandering to his political opponents. Opponents, who did embarass themselves and their supporters but have none-the-less been effective in blocking many of the legislative efforts of the 'majority' party.
If this 'girly-man' party is what you all want - you'll LOVE Romney. Look what he (hasn't) accomplished for the mASS. Republican party! (HINT: NADA)
I don't know what you're talking about. Hastert is a terrific leader. He's not florid and all fire and brimstone like the yahoos want, he just shuts up and gets the job done. And where you get the idea that I approve of Frist's leadership, i don't know. As for Romney, if you think he can somehow make Massachusetts into a Republican state with an overwhlemningly democratic legislature, you're one of those who's part of the problem. Wake up to reality--Ronald Reagan himself (who's one of my favorite presidents but failed to get many things accomplished, we forget)couldn't do a better job than Romney in Massachusetts.