Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WestVirginiaRebel
I have to say, I thought Coleman was fine--he was Galloway's target, but he wasn't swayed, and I think Galloway was blindsided by Levin. I was surprised until I saw Levin on CNN--he sees Galloway not as an enemy of the US but of the UN. So, you see, he was playing to his democrat base; he didn't mind the jabs at America, but once Levin was convinced Galloway was out to hurt the precious UN...

Like the song says, you don't pull on Superman's cape...and you don't mess around with UN.

6 posted on 05/17/2005 10:38:19 PM PDT by Darkwolf (aka Darkwolf377 (lurker since'01, member since 4/'04)--stop clogging me with pings!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Darkwolf

On a 1-10 scale, with Kofi being a 10, how big a player is Galloway in the UN-OFF scandal?


7 posted on 05/17/2005 10:43:59 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Darkwolf

I saw the same interview on CNN. Levin claimed that it was the UN that was the victim of oil for food!

He said the UN was being victimized by people using their humanitarian program for personal wealth. Of course, the CNN anchor never mentioned the involvement of Kofi Annan's son in the scandal.

I said, oh, that's how the left is going to spin it.


18 posted on 05/17/2005 11:01:15 PM PDT by I still care (America is not the problem - it is the solution..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Darkwolf

I can sort of understand why Democrats want to keep the UN. I am Canadian but have a better grasp of the American Republic than Democrats seem to have. Isn't the American Republic suppose to be looking after the interest of Americans? And wasn't the Republic set up to get away from foreign powers from dictating American interests. Some international organization is not suppose to tell America when to take military action. Somehow Democrats think it should.

But what I don't get is why George Bush tolerates the UN. Couldn't Republican Congress and Bush abolish the UN with a stroke of the pen? The UN is a rallying point for all those that hate the United States - not just America as it is - but what the American constitution is all about.

There is no law requiring France, or Germany, or Canada to help the US in its war in Iraq. The fact they bowed out is their prerogative. But not only did they not join, they also attempted to keep the United States from taking unilateral action. And it turns out that it was not based on popular opinion, but what Saddam was able to give them.


23 posted on 05/17/2005 11:13:55 PM PDT by Lord Nelson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Darkwolf

I kept thinking Coleman wasn't even in the Senate when all this happened so why was he going after Coleman ?


32 posted on 05/17/2005 11:38:05 PM PDT by america-rules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Darkwolf
Levin on CNN--he sees Galloway not as an enemy of the US but of the UN.

He was quick to let Galloway know that he wasn't for, that evil, and illegal invasion of Iraq.
51 posted on 05/18/2005 6:38:55 AM PDT by Delphinium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson