Posted on 05/17/2005 6:55:45 PM PDT by wjersey
I saw it.
Nope.
To give you an idea, even Carl Levin raised serious questions about the details surrounding Galloway and Oil for Food.
All Galloway had was bluff, the Senate documents and witnesses.
Just a reminder, since many seem to forget, the Senate didn't ask him to appear, Galloway staged this drama and they granted him his moment. He's had it, it's over, the investigations continue apace and I'm afraid he's in a spot of trouble.
Funny how Eurotrash hate Americans and Jews. Seems to go hand in hand.
I don't agree that he came off all that well, at least not to anybody paying attention. He has the polish of an experienced politician, but beyond the style he offered absolutely nothing of substance.
He simply denied the charges and claimed that the "evidence" was all a plot against him by the global right-wing media.
Ah, yes, that ever-present and all-controlling *right-wing* media. This guy is delusional.
Maybe true, but he is still a Arab sodomizer.
Hmmm. I wonder why Americans hate Eurotrash - this guy just reminded us.
He's fond of saying things like "you're a neo-con pro-Israeli rightwinger".
Seems to dazzle some people, but not me. I was revolted.
The man has dead eyes.
They didn't.
I have no idea why you claim they did.
Perhaps now you're ire will be directed at why they granted him his request to appear?
I think it was fine that they did grant his request for strategic reasons. Note the fact that only Coleman and Levin were there for Galloway's little moment in the sun.
And here he was, under oath.
To repeat, because so few don't seem aware of it:
Congress did not call Galloway.
They released a report last week naming him, the French man, Pasqua, and a Russian, as being recipients of illegal oil allocations from Iraq.
Galloway then thundered his way over and was granted his little hearing.
I dunno... compared to whom? Someone with magnificent personal and professional accomplishments like... Hillary Clinton? Please...
Yeesh...
Did he really say those terms in the testimony? Somehow the snippet I saw on CNN didn't include that, just the slur about being a lawyer and justice.
Yes, he used all those words and more in his testimony. He also was fond of saying "You" this and "You" that, as in "You voted for the illegal war!".
Well, well: look what the cat coughed up.
Not quite.
Galloway neither stated it quite that way, nor is it something that has been "proven" as you so very erroneously state.
Yes, the CSM documents were almost immediately deemed forgeries. The rest...not so fast. And the Senate is in possession of additional documents and witness testimony.
And Coleman did not look the least bit ruffled, let alone "flabbergasted" as you wishfully state.
I watched it. I don't agree.
I'm right.
Politics aside, it was pretty funny to watch.
Seventeen years as chief prosecutor and solicitor general of the state of Minnesota.
And it showed today. He did an excellent job of calmly and professionally handling the hearing and not taking Galloway's bait.
It clearly has you rattled.
Actually, he sounded like Michael Myers "Mr. MacKenzie" character from "So I Married an Axe Murderer".
I was waiting for Galloway to shout, "Head, Paper, Now!!"
or
"The Colonel puts a chemical in his chicken that makes you crave it fortnightly . . ."
Galloway was the male version of Janeane Garofalo.
Norm Coleman was a pretty good prosecutor, and might well have set him up, but who knows.
That's not the hearing I saw.
Nobody else seems to want to comment on the remarkable tone and demeanor of Carl Levin...during his questioning and his remarks after.
He put Galloway on the spot. It's really quite stunning that Levin made it clear that Galloway is in trouble and nobody wants to talk about that, instead being girlishly carried away by a blowhard like Georgie Porgie Galloway.
Yes, Levin spent an inordinate amount of his opening dunning U.S. companies, but he did not, as custom has become all too often for a dem politician, then disregard the specific issue at hand when he spoke to GG.
St. Paul, MN population 821,373
Murrysville, PA population 19,109
You liberals have such a stunning command of facts and analysis.
And nobody voted for you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.