What proof did they have? Any even slightly objective person could see they never touched him.
I repeat again, I don't like Galloway, and didn't like him decades before you had even heard his name, but there is no honour in pretending to see what is not there.
You clearly did not watch the hearing as you claim (or you're spinning like a top).
The first panel was a very detailed offer of documentation and witness statements.
Coleman pointed to some of this in his opening before Galloway spoke.
They have documentation and I'll bet you know it.