No. His style was excellent.
Galloway was outright baiting him and Coleman didn't bite. And they did get him under oath and on the record on a few matters.
I don't care for this relentless negativity based on nothing.
"I don't care for this relentless negativity based on nothing."
I just feel that the committee was very hands-off considering how insulting this guy was and how overwhelming the Senators evidence is.
"Galloway was outright baiting him and Coleman didn't bite."
He didn't challenge Galloway on any of his lies. It's unbelievable to me that Galloway got so few questions after, considering there was overwhelming evidence given against him in the beginning and Galloway refuted pretty much all of it. The only one who even challenged him on his attitude was Levin (D-MI), and even he didn't bring any substantive questions to bear, he only asked for his opinion on a matter that he isn't being charged for.