To: Psycho_Bunny
Not necessarily. There's less need for sensitivity, evolutionarily speaking in male nipples. They are underdeveloped and vestigial. I will not use this as a further analogy to the female orgasm because I know some posters will hunt me down and kill me if I follow the logic.
13 posted on
05/17/2005 8:24:30 AM PDT by
JAWs
To: JAWs
I don't understand what you're saying. The doctor is stating that there's no evolutionary need for female orgasms....that the female orgasm is just for fun....subsequently it's logical to assume, based on the doctor's conclusion, that the male nipples would develop equally to a females, "just for fun"....since the female reproductive organ develops equally to a males in terms of orgasm.The doctor is saying about the female sex organs the same thing you're saying about male nipples.....only we know the female orgasm isn't under-developed or vestigial, so it's entirely logical to assume the doctor doesn't have the slightest idea at all of what she's talking about.
29 posted on
05/17/2005 8:35:08 AM PDT by
Psycho_Bunny
(“I know a great deal about the Middle East because I’ve been raising Arabian horses" Patrick Swazey)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson