Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WoofDog123

Your comment about the Taser is totally irrelevant to this thread.


18 posted on 05/16/2005 11:52:07 PM PDT by de Buillion (Jerusalem, 1099)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: de Buillion
Why is it irrelevant. I remember that article. The police believed the suspect had swallowed some cocaine, although they didn't actually see him do it. They wanted a urine sample. When he wouldn't comply they wanted to take the sample with a catheter. They were zapping the guy with a taser because he wouldn't cooperate in the catheterization process. In both cases police suspected someone had swallowed drugs and in both cases extreme measures were taken to confirm their suspicions. In neither case were these measures necessary.
21 posted on 05/17/2005 6:59:00 AM PDT by TKDietz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: de Buillion

How can another example showing the right of the state to test your fluids, examine your bowels, etc., on demand be totally irrelevant to this thread?


22 posted on 05/17/2005 7:28:46 AM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson