To: WoofDog123
Your comment about the Taser is totally irrelevant to this thread.
18 posted on
05/16/2005 11:52:07 PM PDT by
de Buillion
(Jerusalem, 1099)
To: de Buillion
Why is it irrelevant. I remember that article. The police believed the suspect had swallowed some cocaine, although they didn't actually see him do it. They wanted a urine sample. When he wouldn't comply they wanted to take the sample with a catheter. They were zapping the guy with a taser because he wouldn't cooperate in the catheterization process. In both cases police suspected someone had swallowed drugs and in both cases extreme measures were taken to confirm their suspicions. In neither case were these measures necessary.
21 posted on
05/17/2005 6:59:00 AM PDT by
TKDietz
To: de Buillion
How can another example showing the right of the state to test your fluids, examine your bowels, etc., on demand be totally irrelevant to this thread?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson