The prof was an idiot.
The prof was adjunct. Well, that's usually a yearly contract issue....so they deal with updating that every year.
Schools are usually looking to only have an adjunct for as short of a time as possible. They want tenured tracks and Ph.Ds so they can look competitive against other schools.
The prof knew this.....but risks the dang blong anyway.
THEN THERE IS THE ISSUE OF WRITING WHAT STUDENT TOLD HER IN CONFIDENCE.
Names changed or not...Schools have rules about that for a reason!
She just made SMU liable for the legal crap.
Yeah, that's what I was saying about the prof teaching ethics.
But all I could say was "holy cow".