[publiusF27]

No. I simply interpreted the U.S. Constitution differently.

Uh huh. And the difference would be...?

Maybe that you thought your interpretation was better or more correct than the one reached by the courts? In other words, that you were right, and they were wrong?

[robertpaulsen]

"Uh huh. And the difference would be...?"

... a matter of interpretation.

Maybe that you thought your interpretation was better or more correct than the one reached by the courts? In other words, that you were right, and they were wrong?"

No. The USSC may interpret the right to a "speedy" trial as one which takes place within one year of the crime. I may interpret that as 6 months. Where's the right and wrong? And again, by whose standards?