Over the years, the paper's editorials have taken a reliably Democratic or liberal view of issues, positions some worried would change under Lee's ownership, according to the newspaper trade journal Editor & Publisher. I don't really care about liberalism on the editorial page, it's the leftist editorializing in reporting of actual news that pisses me off.
1 posted on
05/14/2005 12:52:37 PM PDT by
wagglebee
To: wagglebee
The founder of the Sacramento Bee, part of the McClatchy chain, included in the codicil of his will a requirement that the newspaper remain committed in perpetuity to the promotion of "public ownership of private property."Well, isn't that special....
2 posted on
05/14/2005 12:55:30 PM PDT by
ABG(anybody but Gore)
(From Roe v Wade to Terri Schiavo, the RATS have become a death cult...)
To: wagglebee
Can't change the name to the St. Louis Democrat?
3 posted on
05/14/2005 12:55:37 PM PDT by
Brilliant
To: wagglebee
Is this any more enforcable than a codicil never to sell
a house to people of the "wrong" race?
--Travis--
5 posted on
05/14/2005 1:03:23 PM PDT by
TravisABQ
To: wagglebee
It, basically, is the same promise that our old-timey, extremist progressive, dying media made to the Soviet Kremlin before it fell.
8 posted on
05/14/2005 1:40:31 PM PDT by
Tacis
( SEAL THE FRIGGEN BORDER!!!)
To: wagglebee
"..never be satisfied with merely printing news.."
That right there would raise my eyebrow. What a noble mission.
9 posted on
05/14/2005 2:05:44 PM PDT by
Rane _H
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson