[wagglebee]

"As a guide to his views on the subject, DeLay has been urging reporters to read "Men in Black: How the Supreme Court Is Destroying America," reports the Washington Post.

Fat chance of that happening.

[wagglebee]

Ping!

[Txsleuth]

Good for him---I haven't read the book yet, but I LOVE Mark Levin, as you can see from my tagline!!!

If Tom Delay uses his book for a reference source, two things will happen: he will be right and he will further infuriate the dems and libs!!!!! ya-hooty!

[demlosers]

"The Ninth is too big in so many ways," Sensenbrenner told a Stanford University audience this week. "The question is not if the Ninth will be split, but when."

Yes, it would be nice to see Congress exercise their Constitutional authority. Disband the Ninth Circuit altogether instead of splitting it.

[Soul Seeker]

WooHoo!! Delay endores Mark's book! Very cool.

What's this about controversy however? It's Only controversial if someone is in denial of the Truth.

[Dante3]

Both DeLay and Levine are good men. Many judges have gone over the top and need to be removed from office.

[Noachian]

There would be no activist Judiciary if we had a more activist Congress.

The entire concept of "judicial review" is unconstitutional, and the fact that the Congress has let the Supreme Court justices be the sole interpretors of the Constitution says more about the Congress then it does about the Judiciary.

[kittymyrib]

What a great country this would be if there were 100 more DeLay's and Sessenbrenner's in the House!

[F16Fighter]

Levin.....You magnificent bastard -- HE READ YOUR BOOK!

[F16Fighter]

"The Ninth [Circuit Court of Appeals] is too big in so many ways," Sensenbrenner told a Stanford University audience this week. "The question is not if the Ninth will be split, but when."

It should be split like a hog at slaughter -- with the same result.

[goldstategop]

Liberals will not accept conservative judges nor will they accept an end to judicial review. The courts are the last stronghold of their ideology and they like it when judges run amok. Its their only chance to make up for their losses at the ballot box.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)

[planekT]

...Fat chance of that happening....

It doesn't fit in with their belief that when the Judge rules, We the People must bow down to him.

We do not.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1378491/posts

(from the article...)

In 1802, the Jeffersonians, faced with courts deliberately packed by the Federalists, passed the Judiciary Act of 1802, which abolished over half of all the sitting federal circuit judges. The act didn’t impeach them; it simply said their jobs didn’t exist. They wouldn’t be paid, so they shouldn’t bother to show up. The judges were deeply offended. They promptly went to court, and the remaining federal judges essentially said, if we overrule the Congress, they’re going to abolish our jobs.

[tame]

DeLay has been urging reporters to read "Men in Black: How the Supreme Court Is Destroying America," reports the Washington Post.

Delay sure is giving these reporters a lot of credit: most reporters don't have the mental ability to follow the logical reasoning of Mr. Levin.

Still, the reporters should try to read and understand.

Mr. Levin, would you consider running for congress?