If there's no evidence against Mr. Pasqua, then he doesn't need to worry, does he? It's just that simple. Mr. Pasqua seems worried, though.
One other good thing about the US having gone into Iraq, is that the cesspool of crap that is/was "Oil-For-Food" would never have seen the light of day. At least some of those involved have been exposed for what they are.
Chirac's doing a good enough job of that without any outside assistance, thank you. :)
As I understand it the SOB Chirac would be in prison if he hadn't been elected president. As president he has immunity from prosecution for the corruption of his administration over Paris.
And it wouldn't have anything to do with your own corrupt activities, would it Frenchy?
No, it's not a psychosis. It is a relevant observation.
And, it's not quite that simple. First, since there were ongoing sanctions in place by the sacred UN, why were there any economic relations between Iraq and France in the first place. Second, if France was nothing but up-front and honest during the whole debate, why did their ambassador assure Colin Powell that it would not veto the US initiative if it went back one more time to the UN and then break their promise if not to embarass the US and frustrate the coalition's aims?
It's not a psychosis to make reasonable conclusions based on multiple and repeated actions over a long period of time. It would be a psychosis to not re-evaluate the nature of our relationship with Iraq after the actions of France the last 5 - 10 years or so where they have not only been adversarial to the US but have flouted UN sanctions.
Chirac has done everything possible to make an enemy of the American administration, while they worked to put themselves at the center of a world wide US Counter-Alliance.
So now they're shocked when the US tries to discredit their administration? Au'contraire, Chirac! If the US wants your sorry administration out, we just have to wait.
This could all go away if Jacques Chirac would say the following in an international address:
"Good evening.
This afternoon in this room, from this chair, I testified before the U.S. House Subcommittee on National Security, Emerging Threats and International Relations.
I answered their questions truthfully, including questions about my private life, questions no French citizen would ever want to answer.
Still, I must take complete responsibility for all my actions, both public and private. And that is why I am speaking to you tonight.
As you know, in a recent deposition, I was asked questions about my relationship with Saddam Hussein. While my answers were legally accurate, I did not volunteer information.
Indeed, I did have a relationship with Saddam Hussein that was not appropriate. In fact, it was wrong. It constituted a critical lapse in judgment and a personal failure on my part for which I am solely and completely responsible.
But I told the House Subcommittee today and I say to you now that at no time did I ask anyone to lie, to hide or destroy evidence or to take any other unlawful action.
I know that my public comments and my silence about this matter gave a false impression. I misled people, including even my wife. I deeply regret that.
I can only tell you I was motivated by many factors. First, by a desire to protect myself from the embarrassment of my own conduct.
I was also very concerned about protecting my family. The fact that these questions were being asked in a geopolitically inspired probe was a consideration, too.
In addition, I had real and serious concerns about an international investigation that began with private business dealings 14 years ago, dealings I might add about which a U.N. agency has never found evidence of any wrongdoing by me or my wife.
This international investigation moved on to my staff and friends, including Saddam Hussein, then into my private life. And now the investigation itself is coming under criticism from the U.N.
This has gone on too long, cost too much and hurt too many innocent people.
Now, this matter is between me, the two people I love most -- my wife and our daughter -- and the U.N. I must put it right, and I am prepared to do whatever it takes to do so.
Nothing is more important to me personally. But it is private, and I intend to reclaim my family life for my family. It's nobody's business but ours.
Even presidents of France have private lives. It is time to stop the pursuit of personal destruction and the prying into private lives and get on with our international dealings.
The U.N. has been distracted by this matter for too long, and I take my responsibility for my part in all of this. That is all I can do.
Now it is time -- in fact, it is past time to move on.
We have important work to do -- real opportunities to seize, real problems to solve, real security matters to face, more money to make.
And so tonight, I ask you to turn away from the spectacle of the past few years, to repair the fabric of our international discourse, and to return our attention to all the challenges and all the promise of the next French decade, or however long we have.
Thank you for watching. And good night."
Anyone have that photo of Chirac and Saddam touring a nuclear facility in France? I guess the a-hole from the spider hole wanted to see what these things looked like before the French start building him that reactor that the Israelis took out in 1981.
Oh lookie, another French narcissist. It's all about you. Gosh, look how important you are! You're so important, that your criminal activities can bring down Chirac. Of course that leads me to believe that your buddy was in on it too.
Fork France!
"an effort to discredit President Jacques Chirac,":
An oxymoron regarding an ox-brained moron.
Why did I read this headline as "Weightlifter striving to lift mosquito"?
US striving to discredit Chirac
What a coincidence. So is Chirac.
here's a good place to start your research