Well, apparently, your definition of "interesting discussion" is "notes from people who agree with you." Ever stop to think you're not all that superior?
No, I like debate as much as anyone. An interesting discussion would be one where distortion and ad hominem were not tolerated by anyone. You know, the kind of facts-based, logical debate Free Republic used to be pretty good at until this issue. This issue has become pure emotional rhetoric. The sane people bugged out of these threads long ago, even those who thought Terri should live, leaving only a very incestuous clique here who say whatever feels good, not tolerating any discussion that might confront the myths.
It was insane for me to think I could post a complaint here and have any of you decide for yourselves that maybe, just maybe, comparing every medical case to your ever-evolving fantasy of Terri's condition is a losing strategy. It is.