Skip to comments.
Republicans Blast Senate Dem for 'Trashing' Judge's Reputation
GOPUSA.COM ^
| May 13, 2005
| Susan Jones
Posted on 05/14/2005 7:02:43 AM PDT by yoe
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 last
To: cripplecreek
Reid should face charges for that alone. US Senators are above the law - a precedent that has been well established. ;)
41
posted on
05/14/2005 11:03:05 AM PDT
by
Mr. Jeeves
("Violence never settles anything." Genghis Khan, 1162-1227)
To: yoe
"In his speech on the Senate floor Thursday, Sen. Reid criticized Saad, but he also offered to stop the Democrat filibuster of three other nominees from Michigan -- if Senate Republicans don't invoke the nuclear option."
This is the most notable part of the whole issue. The Harry Reid would have the OK to make such an offer if his leftist minions (Schumer, Clinton, Kennedy, Boxer) weren't worried about their tactics backfiring.
Is there any other possible explanation for Reid offering such a concession?
It wasn't that long ago I didn't know who Reid was ..now it seems like a week never passes without getting irritated with him... I've been through backgroud checks and one of the things that allows you to be be totally frank is the assurence that they aren't gonna be on the news talking about your file.
On the other hand
>>The Center for Individual Freedom, a free market advocacy group, called Reid's criticism of Saad irresponsible and unconscionable: "This marks a new low in the obstructionists' campaign to smear nominees to the federal bench, and signals the Democrats' utter desperation," said CFIF President Jeffrey Mazzella.
"Senator Reid has the unmitigated gall to imply that something in Judge Saad's F.B.I. file raises suspicion. Of course, Senator Reid offers no specifics, and everything we know about Judge Saad contradicts Senator Reid's unsubstantiated attack."<<
That's not helpful either since Reid is not allowed to offer specifics and Mazzella hasn't seen the file.
Does anybody know if there is an actual agreement among the parties as to how to handle FBI files or are they just limited by law?
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Not so, at least for the last 120 years or so...........only for legislative issues.
44
posted on
05/14/2005 12:17:40 PM PDT
by
yoe
To: Christian4Bush
Beeuutifully put! Bump & PING!
45
posted on
05/14/2005 12:27:08 PM PDT
by
yoe
To: yoe
Any Republican not voting for stopping this thuggery better have no Higher Office asperations. They will receive the same backstabbing from us worker bees.
Pray for W and Our Troops
46
posted on
05/14/2005 2:11:46 PM PDT
by
bray
(Pray for Iraq's Freedom from Mohammad)
To: DoctorDentons
You got me there DoctorDentons :-)
... but did not the ladies of TWU visit God's country (aka Aggieland, of course) often by train?
Gig 'Em indeed!
Trajan88; TAMU Class of '88; Law Hall (may it R.I.P.) Ramp 9 Mule; f.u.p.!
47
posted on
05/14/2005 3:54:47 PM PDT
by
Trajan88
(www.bullittclub.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson