To: gitmo
Don't think a subpoena, in and of itself.
However, I can't see the enforcement of a confidentiality agreement where the evidence might implicate criminality.
At the least, a Special Master (independent judge) should be able to review the documentation to ascertain whether it rises to the level of potential criminality.
The elite international "powers that be" obviously want this matter squelched. Practically, however, I think one way or another, this documentation is going to see the light of day (leak to Rush, book, etc. ) I'm sure this guy has already made several copies of the damaging info.
36 posted on
05/14/2005 8:44:53 AM PDT by
sirthomasthemore
(I go to my execution as the King's humble servant, but God's first!)
To: sirthomasthemore
I hope the whistle blower who seems bright enough--has copied 5-7 copies of key documents and secreted them amongst as many close friends.
Gonna get ugly . . . uglier.
44 posted on
05/14/2005 9:41:01 AM PDT by
Quix
(LOVE NEVER FAILS.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson