[Jeff Head]

Amen...tell the JUdge that they will not recognize or follow his order. And then the Executive Branch should refuse to enforce it.

Here we have proof of illegal, fraudulent acts by the UN leadership with our money and some Judge moves to keep it from being entered.

I am sorry...but spank the FBI agent's hand (very lightly) for violating his agreement with the UN...and then give him the highest civilian medal available for remaining true to his duty as a citizen and a Federal employeee...a duty to the United States and the Constitution which supercedes said UN agreement.

The UN is an anti-American institution and should be sent packing from our shores and our membership in it, and our monetary support of it should have ended decades ago.

[the gillman@blacklagoon.com]

Time we withdrew the nomination of Mr Bolton as ambassador and sent in the marines instead.

CWII

[investigateworld]

Actually, the US Courts have ruled in the past that agreements to hide criminal conduct are against the 'public interest'* and are invalid. Thus no paddy smacking is required.



*unless of course, one is an attorney.

[Ben Hecks]

I wouldn't think the UN would have standing to take any legal action in a U.S. court - the UN should go through the U.S. Ambassador and present their grievance to the State Dept.