Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. JUDGE SETS PRECEDENT FOR UNITED NATIONS SOVEREIGNTY OVER AMERICA
montanasnews.com ^ | 05/12/05 | Bill Wilson

Posted on 05/14/2005 5:57:08 AM PDT by nextthunder

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: SunnySide

And the UN is nothing but a tool on the end of the globalist puppet masters' string.

And they are nothing but a powerful tool on the end of satan's string.

All well predicted more than 2,000 years ago.

What a drama we have a ring side seat to. Now, I pray for an early exit from the ring! I don't care to watch much from this side of eternity. Thanks anyway. LOL.


41 posted on 05/14/2005 9:38:12 AM PDT by Quix (LOVE NEVER FAILS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: dc27
I would love to see Annan get canned.

The first time I read your comment I thought you were expressing a wish to see him get caned.

42 posted on 05/14/2005 9:38:29 AM PDT by JCEccles (Andrea Dworkin--the Ward Churchill of gender politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Almondjoy

I very strongly agree.

Whistleblowers should be made our Rock/Hollyweed stars.

They are the only ones who truly earn star status.


43 posted on 05/14/2005 9:39:40 AM PDT by Quix (LOVE NEVER FAILS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: sirthomasthemore

I hope the whistle blower who seems bright enough--has copied 5-7 copies of key documents and secreted them amongst as many close friends.

Gonna get ugly . . . uglier.


44 posted on 05/14/2005 9:41:01 AM PDT by Quix (LOVE NEVER FAILS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles

Works for me.

Though his bosses deserve it far more.


45 posted on 05/14/2005 9:42:36 AM PDT by Quix (LOVE NEVER FAILS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles
Where Kofi is concerned, I prefer your version.
46 posted on 05/14/2005 9:44:13 AM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg (Children's classic songs updated for Islam "If you're happy and you know it, Go Kaboom!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: gitmo
"Can't a subpoena override a contract of confidentiality?"

If it doesn't, it should, more so, when one considers the "source" of said contractual obligation.

We are (at least not yet--but probably won't be too long now, thanks to Justices Kennedy and O'Connor) NOT subject to ANY force of law from the U.N. and this judge (as are most activist jurist) is out to lunch.

Can anyone really appreciate the precedent this is setting.

Old Sadam must be kicking himself silly for not having thought of simply finding some wacko judge (and believe me, he could have) to "enjoin" (and gotten a TRO--Temporary Restraining Order) the US from pulling the plug on him?

"Beam me up, Scottie."

47 posted on 05/14/2005 12:37:28 PM PDT by An American Patriot ("GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME"-- the opportunity to get the Hell out of here! Bye Bye VT- Hello, VA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Quix
"...and whoever shuns evil becomes a prey. ..."
48 posted on 05/14/2005 12:57:16 PM PDT by monkeywrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: nextthunder

So how is the judge going to excecute his judgement?

Just say no should be the Congressional policy.


49 posted on 05/14/2005 1:00:43 PM PDT by bert (Rename Times Square......... Rudy Square.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RAY

A lazy assed overpaid and unwilling to give up a day on the golf course or other leisure activity, to stay on the job in pursuit of truth and justice and to earn their pay , arguing the law and constitutionality of a case- found it far more simple and less time consuming to just treat past decisions on similar cases, regardless of the un-constitutionality, assinity or screwed up and scewered reason for the decision and personal bias of the judge, as the law of the land.

Precedents represent an attitude among the judiciary that amounts to: "Fu*k the written law, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights it rode in on!

Fu*k the law of the land, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, is the litmus test a Judge must pass to be confirmed by democrat Senators such as Hairy Arse Reed, Chris Dodd,Kennedy, Robert Byrd, that idiot from the postage stamp size state Deleware, etc., and RINOs like Snow, McCaine, etc.


50 posted on 05/14/2005 1:41:15 PM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (If bullsh*t was fuel-the liberal dems would be a national......nay...... international treasure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bert
"So how is the judge going to excecute his judgement?"

Just say no should be the Congressional policy."

EXACTLY. Like the way you think.

What can he do if they refuse? Hold the Congress in contempt? Yeah, Right!

Would like to see him order the Marshal's to go fetch some Senators? LOL

You know, that is what p*ssed me off the most about the Terri case.

Had the LEA (Pinellas Park PD & County Mounties) told Judge Greer to shove it (as legally, he did/does NOT have any authority over them and this was unique as far as I know) then there may have been a different outcome.

51 posted on 05/14/2005 2:32:24 PM PDT by An American Patriot ("GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME"-- the opportunity to get the Hell out of here! Bye Bye VT- Hello, VA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: nextthunder
Bottom line: Court authority seems to be trumping both the Executive Branch and Congressional authority in the Constitutional balance between the three branches of government.

"Seems to be" is the operative phrase. Court authority only trumps Congressional authority if weak-kneed Congressional leaders allow it. I do not believe that Henry Hyde is weak-kneed. I suspect that Hyde has been copying and distributing Parton's papers all week. At least I certainly hope he has. I mean, duh.... why wouldn't he? Hyde is NOT a spineless milquetoast - - I just know it.

Plus, Hyde surely knows better than to return the papers to Volcker. The only reason Volcker wants them back is so that he knows what Hyde has. Volcker needs to know this so he knows how to lie.

52 posted on 05/14/2005 2:43:54 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monkeywrench

Please reference your quote and your point about it.

I'd rather shun evil and be on God's side and experience His rewards and protection even if He allowed martyrdom

than go with satan and share his 'rewards.'


53 posted on 05/14/2005 2:57:57 PM PDT by Quix (LOVE NEVER FAILS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Quix

To post #43. Whistleblowers wanting to do the right thing.


54 posted on 05/14/2005 3:10:54 PM PDT by monkeywrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: nextthunder

Judges don't determine the soverignty of this nation. Men with guns do that.

The UN only uses their guns against unarmed women and children for sexual adventures.

Our people and I would hope our generals, would never stand for such a thing as UN control.

I hope so anyway.


55 posted on 05/14/2005 3:22:07 PM PDT by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nextthunder
What jurisdiction does Congress have over a foreign entity?

Does Congress have a authority to access the info of internal investigation of a foreign entity?

If criminal acts have been committed on US soil why aren't the police involved? Does the UN have diplomatic immunity?

Does the UN have foreign sovereignty?

This should be interesting regardless of the outcome.
56 posted on 05/14/2005 4:58:19 PM PDT by Smartaleck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nextthunder

not good..


57 posted on 05/14/2005 4:59:20 PM PDT by JesseJane ((Close the borders))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alia

~sovereignty ping~

Not good.


58 posted on 05/14/2005 5:00:34 PM PDT by JesseJane ((Close the borders))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nextthunder
Allow me to further put this latest exercise in subservience to the New World Order agenda in perspective:

U.S. JUDGE PRESIDENT SETS PRECEDENT FOR UNITED NATIONS MEXICAN SOVEREIGNTY OVER AMERICA

Read that and weep.

59 posted on 05/14/2005 5:06:04 PM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quix

could you make that a lil bit bigger?


60 posted on 05/14/2005 5:07:36 PM PDT by Casaubon (Internet Research Ninja Masta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson