Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

You are exactly right, we would be fine with nuclear power. Infact it is the future of energy I believe sooner or later.

The green movements rejection of nuclear power leads me to believe their goal is de-industrialization, not concerns of environmental damage.


63 posted on 05/14/2005 4:57:44 AM PDT by ran15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: ran15
That 3-mile Island event wasn't what the media and the pseudo-eco-fascists made it out to be. It released only inert Xenon gas and is a far cry safer than Chernobyl could have ever hoped to be.

If the reactors we do have were running at capacity, I'll bet most of the energy supply problems would disappear. California could build two huge ones in the desert, one to supply the Northern state, and another to supply the Southern state. Crisis solved.

What about waste? Doesn't matter... If you don't take the uranium ore out of the ground, it leaches into ground water.

It would be a good idea to store the waste on the moon.
(I think this is why the television show Space 1999 was created - - to discourage the idea. They depicted the moon being blasted off into the nether regions of space by explosions. We know this is not possible. More info-tainment junk science for the unwashed.)

75 posted on 05/14/2005 7:09:30 AM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson