Posted on 05/13/2005 8:27:00 PM PDT by woofie
The Don of talk-show radio was raving mad. The Wall Street Journal had just published a front-page story on March 24 that questioned the finances of the Imus Ranch in New Mexico for sick children. No one messes with the I-Man. So he mauled the messenger, Robert Frank.
"He is a dishonest reporter," Imus told the masses who listen to him on his "Imus In The Morning" syndicated radio program and watch him on the MSNBC simulcast. "He did a hatchet job." Then, for good measure, he called Frank's wife "a pig."
Imus' audience knew exactly what to do. They'd heard his rant-a-thons before. They rushed to their computers and telephones to vent at the staff reporter. Frank received dozens of telephone calls and e-mails, some of them threatening and others that impugned his integrity, his writing, and his newspaper.
The Wall Street Journal may move the market, but Imus moves the masses. His frenzied followers believe what he tells them, for Imus is their truth. The Journal is part of the lying mainstream media.
It didn't matter that the WSJ story noted that it costs the ranch $27,000 for each 10-day camp stay, far more than similar charity camps spend. "Does it cost too much per kid?" Imus asked the newspaper. "Maybe it does. I would spend $2.6 million or $1.8 million, if I thought it could change kids' lives." Imus has donated $1 million of his own money to the ranch.
The Journal also reported that Imus might have to reimburse the IRS for his personal use of the ranch. He broadcasts his show during the summer from a studio there. He and his wife, Deirdre Coleman Imus (both of whom are unpaid members of the Imus Ranch Inc. board of directors) also use the mansion there for vacations.
The WSJ article was the second major investigation of the ranch. The first, on Feb. 10, 2003 by Thomas J. Cole of The Albuquerque (N.M.) Journal, raised some of the same financial issues the WSJ report did.
Cole told me how Imus, during his show, made a pre-emptive rant against the Albuquerque Journal a full 18 months before the story was published. "He called us petty, negative, and since we were making it personal, he would go after our publisher [Thompson H. Lang]," he recalled.
But Imus, for reasons that he never aired, didn't say anything after the story was finally published. Cole says he's glad the WSJ followed it up: "They did a great job of laying out the accounting issues."
New Mexico reporters have absorbed a series of Imus' attacks since he and his wife started building the ranch there seven years ago. In the summer of 1998 he raged on the air against Karen Peterson, then a reporter for the Santa Fe New Mexican, after she reported that Imus used state workers to tear down some buildings on public land he'd leased. Imus called her "a skank" and a "troll," gave out her office telephone number over the air, and suggested his listeners follow his lead in making her life miserable.
Peterson thought the "troll" comments were funny: "We formed a club called The Trolls for women who covered the capital." But she was stunned by the hundreds of e-mails and phone calls that followed from Imus Nation. "It was vicious," said Peterson, now a reporter for the Albuquerque Journal. "People said I hated cancer kids, that they hoped I got AIDS. I was blown away by his ability to incite a mob."
Three years later Imus also went after Wren Propp, another Journal reporter, after she disclosed that Imus had fired Jane Smith — an interior decorator for the ranch who alleged she'd been shortchanged in a contract dispute.
"I don't listen to him, but my mother does, and she called to tell me that his insults meant I was doing something right," Propp said with a laugh.
There is no question that the Imus ranch has provided hundreds of severely ill children with a summer experience that brought sunshine into their troubled lives. And he has every right to bark back at the media watchdogs who criticize his handling of the ranch. But he has an obligation to do more than scream at them. His personal attacks against anyone who dares to question how he spends the millions in his care may make people wonder whether he has something to hide.
Howard Houghton, city editor of the New Mexican, gave his analysis of Imus: "He seems like a thin-skinned guy who enjoys flexing his muscles. He thinks he can intimidate newspapers, but it won't work." He notes that when his paper runs stories critical of certain people, "We don't give out phone numbers and tell people to call them up."
Howard Stern was the first person I heard question the actual purpose of this ranch. It was when the "mansion" there was featured in Architectural Digest. The gist of it is: is this to help sick children, or is to provide Imus and his insufferable family with a tax-exempt luxury vacation home?
I must say, between the Imus "mob" and the Stern "mob", my money's on the babba-booie set.
"And one of the kids eyed the carton, then Newman, and asked him if he was 'lost'"
LOL! That's a cute story.
Good thinking ...
I havea farm in Texas ..Im raising ants...My child says she is deprived ...I will get the government to send her out there to get some fresh air ...see if she gets happier
On what grounds or charge?
LOL! I once heard Howard Stern dub him "Anus in the Morning." What a crybaby!
Got a link for that information?
He happens to be the best interviewer in the business. Your loss.
Not doing anything is hard work
Dang. Someone scanned in the photos from Architectural Digest and posted them at FR. Must have been his stupid wife who *insisted* they be in that magazine
The kids that go to the ranch are not always cancer patients like it was supposed to be. Sometimes it's kids who siblings has SID's....sometimes it's siblings of cancer patients. But that's not the crux of the problem. He uses it as a SECOND HOME that FOOLS paid for. If he never used it for anything else but having kids there, then that would be great, BUT it isn't.
Plus the fools that pay for it get DISSED by him on his show.....stupid people.
I guess I heard this at some time in my life when hubby was listening to Howard Stern. The place sounded swanky to the max, that I will say. I'll say one thing for Stern, he's a great alarm clock, almost every day I'd run from the bedroom because of SOMETHING he'd said. I stopped listening to Imus exactly because of his unending, unbearable, paens to Dierdre, and that poor child whom she is attempting to torment into perfection. At least Howard Stern made his wife seem like a normal person.
I like your tagline, btw.
No, but Imus's demographic is lower middle class young men, and the WSJ's isn't.
Ain't it just like the night to play tricks when you're tryin' to be so quiet?
We sit here stranded, though we're all doin' our best to deny it
And Louise holds a handful of rain, temptin' you to defy it
Lights flicker from the opposite loft
In this room the heat pipes just cough
The country music station plays soft
But there's nothing, really nothing to turn off
Just Louise and her lover so entwined
And these visions of Johanna that conquer my mind
No, I'm not kidding, and I'll ask you again, on what ground or charge would you have the IRS investigate him?
I'd like to see a link for that statement, also?
I hope you're right, though. If young people are watching his show, that means they're watching a show for grown-ups and not the kiddie shows like the rest of the MSM tries to feed them.
Imus used to have a 7am show on Cleveland radio in the late 90s. Everyone hated him and he was there less than a year.
Everyone?
Sorry, I thought you could read.
From what I read about the way he trashed MSNBC news-reader Contessa Brewer on his show, he deserves to be fired. (called her a fat-@ssed skank) She didn't deserve that.
and forget about all the things he said about Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld during the campaign.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.