Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: frgoff
Well, this is a federal judge declaring a state constitutional amendment federally unconstitutional. Not quite the same.

One solitary man, a lawyer, an unelected life-tenured activist federal judge, legislating his personal views of how society ought to be ordered in Nebraska, trumping the Nebraska hundred member legislature and negating the constitution of its million people.

There is nothing praiseworthy about that.

63 posted on 05/13/2005 7:33:22 AM PDT by JCEccles (Andrea Dworkin--the Ward Churchill of gender politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: JCEccles

I didn't say it was praiseworthy. I said it wasn't the same as a state judge declaring a state constitutional amendment unconstitutional.

The equivalent would be a federal judge declaring the gay marriage amendment to the U.S. Constitution unconstitutional.


97 posted on 05/13/2005 10:23:20 AM PDT by frgoff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: JCEccles
One solitary man...trumping the Nebraska hundred member legislature and negating the constitution of its million people.

Actually there's only 49 senators in the single-house Unicameral legislature and we have about 1.6 million in population.

112 posted on 05/13/2005 11:53:03 PM PDT by Skybird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson