No, it hasn't! Not once! If you would provide a link to it, I'd be happy. You could also just tell me.
Why wouldn't you share this important information?
No, it hasn't! Not once!How about payroll and personal income taxes.
First you count all payroll taxes as being costs to the employee. Your plan would give the employee most of this money in his pocket. Then your hired gun economists tell us all taxes are embedded in the cost of goods, this includes the payroll tax that you already accounted for as being paid by the employee. You can't have it both ways. If the employee is counted as paying his taxes and gets to keep that money, then much of the so-called embedded costs will still be in the costs and prices will not come down nearly as much as your paid for whores say they will. If you assume all taxes are embedded (which is the only way you can claim a 20-30% embedded costs), then you can not simitaneously tell us that employees get to keep all most of their payroll taxes. Employees must take a pay cut or their model is bogus.