FGS
Landru misses nothing to do with our Liberal-Socialist quislings, my friend.
Thanks anyway. ;^)
"May yield some interesting results???"
Think so??
Well let's have a look.
I've C&P'd a few clues which tell me that probably won't be the case.
Have a look for yourself, again.
"Reps. David Obey [D-WI] and John Dingell [D-MI] have asked for..."
~eh???
'Rat's favorite MO.
March-out one or a couple of their miscreants who'll bring to everyones attention a specific issue.
That's always been a signal for the beginning of a massive assault they feel is worth their time & resources, every time.
"...CPB board chairman Kenneth Y. Tomlinson, a Republican..."
Let's look back at the political affiliation(s) of every CPB honcho over the past 30 years, shall we? {Nawwww.}
"The New York Times reported last week that the consultant kept track of 'anti-Bush,' 'anti-business' and 'anti-Tom DeLay' guests on the show."
HA!!!
Uh-huh, good ol' unbiased NYSlimes.
The Slimes has been *watching* -- "They report, you decide", right?
Ever-vigilant, the Slimes. ;^)
"CPB Inspector General Kenneth A. Konz told The Associated Press."
Alright, now we've a party!!
The Liberal-Socialist quislings from The Associated Quislings show up.
Their mission if they should choose to accept it?
Too to further *buttress* the seriousness of the charges.
"Moyers was on vacation Thursday and unavailable for comment..."
Oy vey.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
~eh?
"He [Moyers] is scheduled to address the issue Sunday in a speech to the National Conference for Media Reform in St. Louis. "
There we go.
Right on que & *not* an instant, before.
*Timing's* everything, as you know.
The *timing* of our Liberal-Socialist crap's a virtual *science*.
"In their letter to Konz on Wednesday, Obey, D-Wis., and Dingell, D-Mich., said Tomlinson's actions may have violated the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967, which bans interference by federal officials over public programming."
I sure don't know who *authored* the PBAct of 1967, but could guess.
Care to take a stab at which side penned this *legislation*?
"The CPB, a private, nonprofit corporation funded by Congress, provides funds for PBS. 'Congress intended that the CPB serve as a shield rather than a source of political interference into public broadcasting,' they wrote."
:o)
Oh geshhhh.
Here we are in the year 2005 and *someone* noticed the ol' pot of water's [been] boiling.
How do you like your frog legs, FGS?
OK then, that my friend looks like a stacked deck, if I ever saw one.
The Liberal-Socialists have fired the opening salvo, marshaling their [immense] forces to the defense of this all-too-important propaganda organ they've relied so heavily upon for many a decade, without question all these years from anyone on the right.
Means one thing insofar the Pitiful Bullshit Source's future is concerned.
PBS'll be around for a long time to come.
And OBTW, off-topic here but how about SeeBS completely MISquoting Judge Starr a few days, ago?
The Viacom quislings really learned their *lesson* with "Rathergate", didn't they.
Yet somehow, someway SeeBS appears to be right back at their old Liberal-Socialist tricks.
Methinks there's a very good likelihood we'll be treated to a 60 Minutes *investigation* into the "PBS scandal"!!!
Yeaaaa!!
Right?
...the situation's damned close to hopeless.