To: B Knotts
Its not just gay marriage. This judge's ruling strengthen the case for a constitutional amendment abolishing judicial review. When a single judge takes it on himself to disregard the views of 70% of the voters in the American heartland, we are heading for a constitutional crisis. I stated yesterday my conviction judges have no business deciding questions of a social or political nature. Their only duty ought to be to see how the law is enforced and to punish offenders.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
20 posted on
05/12/2005 1:40:24 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: goldstategop
I agree, but I don't think we're heading for a constitutional crisis; we're already there.
The judiciary is out of control.
23 posted on
05/12/2005 1:41:49 PM PDT by
B Knotts
(Viva il Papa!)
To: goldstategop
Yep. Nice concise way of putting it. The Constitutional Amendment to Abolish Judicial Review.
It will never fly. We need a nice soft euphemism. But we have to defang the courts. I guess we are lucky that they are overreaching to the point where we are going to be able to get the country behind us now.
93 posted on
05/12/2005 2:43:35 PM PDT by
johnb838
(Free Republicans... To Arms!)
To: goldstategop
When a single judge takes it on himself to disregard the views of 70% of the voters in the American heartland, we are heading for a constitutional crisis. Unless, of course, the 70% just back down and give up. Which is the most probable outcome.
To: goldstategop
Its not just gay marriage. This judge's ruling strengthen the case for a constitutional amendment abolishing judicial review. When a single judge takes it on himself to disregard the views of 70% of the voters in the American heartland, we are heading for a constitutional crisis. I stated yesterday my conviction judges have no business deciding questions of a social or political nature. Their only duty ought to be to see how the law is enforced and to punish offenders.As an EX-CA....I remember voting YES for "term limits" and Prop 187. Along with Prop. 208, and 5...all being overturned in the courts.
I dunno why anyone is surprised when we have political office holder's dominated by lawyers..that they turn to the courts..when they don't like what the peon peasants vote for...or against.
FWIW-
151 posted on
05/12/2005 4:00:20 PM PDT by
Osage Orange
(Bill Clinton's heart is blacker than the devil's riding boots.....................................)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson