You're not getting what I am saying. You used a term, neocon, that is universally viewed as a liberal one. If I started using the slogan "power to the people" how far do you suppose my credibility would carry on this forum? I have no problem with you or anyone else disagreeing with the policy of this administration. I myself disagree with some of them but I do not use liberal slogans to do so. You are smooth in your own defense but basically I think your full of it and will feel this way until I see substantial evidence to the contrary. You have been handed the play book on how to appear conservative even if you are not. Let's see how close to the script you stay.
>>You're not getting what I am saying. You used a term, neocon, that is universally viewed as a liberal one. If I started using the slogan "power to the people" how far do you suppose my credibility would carry on this forum? I have no problem with you or anyone else disagreeing with the policy of this administration. <<
That's your slant on it and you're entitled to your slant. If I use the term neocon negatively it's because it's not my brand of conservatism... That wing of the party lost me when they covered up the statue of justice and launched an invasion without good grounding. I'm also not real thrilled with the resulting budget deficit.
>>Compared to other U.S. conservatives, neoconservatives are characterized by an aggressive moralist stance on foreign policy, a lesser social conservatism, weaker dedication to a policy of minimal government, and a greater acceptance of the welfare state.<<
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservatism_%28United_States%29
Paul has been very polite, IMHO, and I welcome him and all his opinions (no matter how wrong they may be!) ;-)