[groanup]

My "argument" was that the panel expressed concerns about compliance under a NRST. How was that "addressed"? Where is the "credibility" in replying that the income tax and VAT have compliance issues, too?

That's not the point. You are attacking AG because of his "cut and paste" when it is obvious to everyone here that his cut and paste is very relevant. That's what we do on this board, state an opinion and back it up with sources. He's doing that and you're attacking him for it. Credibility.

[Your Nightmare]

That's not the point. You are attacking AG because of his "cut and paste" when it is obvious to everyone here that his cut and paste is very relevant.

Did you poll "everyone"? Where is your "empirical data" that "it is obvious to everyone here that his cut and paste is very relevant"?

That's what we do on this board, state an opinion and back it up with sources. He's doing that and you're attacking him for it. Credibility.

Please, AG's modus operandi is to steadfastly defend the FairTax with irrational asumptions and illogical conclusions and then litter his posts with quotes from sources that he thinks will make him look educated, like the Federalist Papers.

If you want a real laugh, go look at some of his posts on global warming.