YN you're losing credibility here. As anyone lurking here can see, AG is addressing the arguments specifically. He uses the debater's own quotes as is customary.
YN you're losing credibility here. As anyone lurking here can see, AG is addressing the arguments specifically. He uses the debater's own quotes as is customary.My "argument" was that the panel expressed concerns about compliance under a NRST. How was that "addressed"? Where is the "credibility" in replying that the income tax and VAT have compliance issues, too?