Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BykrBayb

Terri's autopsy should prove to be very imterestimgI wonder is Felos will sue to have it sealed if it remotely shows in "client" in a bad light


16 posted on 05/11/2005 7:12:25 PM PDT by Popman ("I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it." Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Popman

If there was any chance of that, I'm sure he would. Of course, when the medical examiner refused to allow the common courtesy of an independent observer, that pretty much erased any doubt about what the results will be. It's not only common practice to allow an independent observer. It's unheard of to refuse it.


18 posted on 05/11/2005 7:16:54 PM PDT by BykrBayb (Impeach Judge Greer - In memory of Terri Schindler <strike>Schiavo</strike> - www.terrisfight.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Popman

No need to seal it. If the coroner were not "in the bag," someone else would be performing the autopsy. Cyril Wecht was interviewed on a local radio program about not being allowed to be present when the coroner conducted the autopsy. He said it was the first time anyone had refused him "professional courtesy" to observe. He has quite an ego and was taken aback at the coroner's attitude. Also, no reason was given for the refusal. That ruffled his feathers even more.


59 posted on 05/12/2005 8:38:16 AM PDT by penowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson