Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: firebrand
There weren't lots of Adam and Eve couples but only one.

Well, that was my point. How did humanity multiply from Adam and Eve without massive incest? And since incest was inevitable and required for the expansion of mankind, what is wrong with it now?

113 posted on 05/11/2005 6:34:02 PM PDT by Semper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]


To: Semper
My point was that all of us stemming from the same original couple is the important truth. There was no convergent evolution, so that is the physical truth conveyed. Before we had the leisure and curiosity to get into all these literal-versus-figurative arguments, we understood from the Creation story that there was one source.

And spiritually, there had to be a first human. The animals don't understand that there is a God. There had to be a first creature who could see that there was a God. And that was Adam. To worry about incest when a truth like that is being given to us is looking for flyshit in the pepper.

115 posted on 05/11/2005 6:41:58 PM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson