[hershey]

Sometimes Pat argues odd ideas for the heck of it, not because he seriously believes them.

[Strategerist]

Sometimes Pat argues odd ideas for the heck of it, not because he seriously believes them.

They're not even new or original odd ideas; the whole article is basically recycled from some controversial British historian whose name escapes me at the moment.

[KidGlock]

Sometimes Pat argues odd ideas for the heck of it, not because he seriously believes them.

And sometimes Hillary is not scheming to become president.

Why on earth would anyone beleive what you posted?

If Pat was going to argue a contrary idea that he did not believe in, he would AT LEAST ONCE argue against the Nazi or for the Jews.