To: hedgetrimmer
If they are going to sink one of our ships, they better do it with a Democrat as President.
Sure would not want to have a factory in China if that happens. Bye Bye Money.
4 posted on
05/10/2005 6:15:24 PM PDT by
microgood
(Evolution is a Cancer on Conservatism)
To: microgood
The problem here (if it is a problem) is that we don't want to use nukes, becasue China can also devastate our homeland. But the ultimate deterrent has to be the nukes. Why should we let China destroy our fleet? Admittedly, it is preferable to be able to beat them in a conventional war as well. But the nuke deterrent kept us from going toe to toe with the Soviets.
My bottom line is Bush ought to be expanding our navy, as Reagan did.
10 posted on
05/10/2005 6:22:48 PM PDT by
Williams
To: microgood
"would not want to have a factory in China if that happens."
The US unemployment would dip to <1% ....
198 posted on
05/10/2005 10:11:43 PM PDT by
traumer
To: microgood
You've nailed it. As long as we are the marketplace of record, there PROBABLY won't be war with China. This is especially true given the fact that the PLA is legal controlling partner of every foreign-owned entity in China.
245 posted on
05/11/2005 12:53:16 PM PDT by
RinaseaofDs
(The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson