To: nickcarraway
Many economists believe that in spite of the unexpectedly large rise in job creation of 274,000 That wasn't a rise in job creation. I was a rise in modeling job creation.
Over 90% of this increase is due to the Birth/Death Model.
CES Net Birth/Death Model
4 posted on
05/10/2005 2:47:44 PM PDT by
AdamSelene235
(Truth has become so rare and precious she is always attended to by a bodyguard of lies.)
To: AdamSelene235
I don't believe you understand the Net Birth/Death Model.
The 257k added by the Model is not just lobbed onto the seasonally adjusted payroll increase that was 274k in April, it is figured in the non-seasonally adjusted increase in payrolls, which was over 1.1 million in April.
9 posted on
05/10/2005 2:53:32 PM PDT by
RWR8189
(Its Morning in America Again!)
To: AdamSelene235
Over 90% of this increase is due to the Birth/Death Model. The birth/death model also shows an increase of 400k jobs in January. Not a good indicator. The number is what it is.
14 posted on
05/10/2005 2:56:32 PM PDT by
groanup
(http://fairtax.org)
To: AdamSelene235; nickcarraway
Over 90% of this increase is due to the Birth/Death Model. And modeling the birth/death of businesses doesn't accurately measure job creation/loss?
36 posted on
05/10/2005 3:46:43 PM PDT by
Toddsterpatriot
(If you agree with Karl Marx, the AFL-CIO and E.P.I. please stop calling yourself a conservative!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson