Can't they find somebody more credible to lead the charge against Hillary than an ex-cocaine addict, communist sympathesizer, and con artist like Peter Paul?
Honestly, from my perspective, what we should really be highlighting is that the Clintons stooped so low as to associate with this type of shady character.
This all smells like a trap to me. Have Peter Paul organize the opposition to her, and build a high profile in the media (like SBVT). Then a mysterious file is handed to the NY Times, exposing some sort of illicit activity by Peter Paul, and Hillary's critics are "discredited."
No, they can't, because THESE are the type of people the Clinton's surround themselves with.
I agree. His credibility is going to cause a backfire here. I can see the dems somehow flipping this around and Hillary will come out smelling like a rose. It's obvious he's out to bring her down.
"Can't they find somebody more credible to lead the charge against Hillary than an ex-cocaine addict, communist sympathesizer, and con artist like Peter Paul?"
Methinks he might actually be legit. Could be he does know where a body or two are buried and is doing this media thing to prevent an Arkancide. His.
:)