Lol. It's funny.
What is NOT funny is that the Asians, especially the Chinese and Japanese, have REAPED the benefits of affirmative action. That is, MOST never needed it but ALL got it because of their race.
Reverse racism is STILL rearing its ugly head....now it has the law on its side.
And because it is part of the law, reverse racism, that is, it's even uglier and more pernicious, in my opinion, because the government and minorities KNOW BETTER, KNOW that it's reverse racism and KNOW THAT IT'S WRONG, WRONG, WRONG.
Minorities (not every single one, of course) still buy into it and defend it to the death because, at heart, they are JUST AS RACIST as they accuse whites of being.
Racism is a two-way street -- always has been; always will be.
Not sure where, but in the SCOTUS case involving the university of Michagen, The school held asians to a higher standard then whites, and minorities to a lower standard. It was a point system, and you got more points for being white then asian, and awhole boat load of points for being black and variations of spanish (you got to look at it yourself to believe it).
That was the part that stuck out to me.
Also Berkley, without shame, admits to holding a higher standard for asians/pacific islander/orientals.
Hell, I still don't get how indians and chinese are somehow recognised the same.
Harvard and Yale, do also hold a higher standard for asians (but are to racist to bother seperating them). I know the one kid who got a perfect SAT score and got rejected by Harvard (okay, he wound up going to Yale, but you get the point).
It varies, but I'm not aware of any school or even job that gives preferances to asians for ethnic or national reasons, Michelle Malkin can be sourced on that.