Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pbrown
Didn't they tell her to get out of the car and she refused?

for what purpose other than hassle factor was she asked to exit the vehicle?

After letting her hear the tazer

Psychological intimidation by servants of the court, who full well were aware of her pregnant condition

and then again telling her to get out of the car

again, why ? - the ticket was already dispensed and the cause for stop was complete

she wouldn't let go of the steering wheel?

why should she - IMO - she was being intimidated and coerced into signing an incriminating instrument.

whats say we agree to disagree ?

93 posted on 05/10/2005 8:18:38 AM PDT by Revelation 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: Revelation 911
I don't agree with the tazer bit. She chose to disobey their order to get out of the car. She knew she was pregnant. For the safety of her baby should have gotten out. She put her 'I'm not getting out' over the safety of her baby. She also endangered innocent children by speeding. If she had ran over and killed a child, she would be facing vehicular homicide.
99 posted on 05/10/2005 8:30:47 AM PDT by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson