She wasn't tasered for speeding. She was tasered cause she resisted a lawful arrest.
It may or may not have been the best course of action, but there is only one person that is responsible for it going to that point. She is the one that actively resisted a LAWFUL arrest.
If she cared for that unborn child as much as you seem to, she wouldn't have put herself in the position by unnecessarily escalating the confrontation.
Cut the histrionics and hyperbole. Stick to the facts
"If she cared for that unborn child as much as you seem to, she wouldn't have put herself in the position by unnecessarily escalating the confrontation. "
That rings of the "If you have nothing to hide" response.
First, you missed the statements being made that she was "speeding" and that caused her to deserve whatever she got.
Second, even resisting lawful arrest does not require a taser. Get real. A pregnant woman cannot be restrained by a cop? If so, the cop has no justification for being a cop. It seems you are advocating extreme use of force. I hope like Hell you are not a cop.