Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Chiapet
"Yeah, but using your pregnancy to try to shield yourself from a speeding ticket and subsequent arrest is way over the line too. The mother should be the first person to think about the safety of her unborn child."

Sorry, but she did no such thing. All she did was refuse to sign the ticket--note the section where she wasn't REFUSING the ticke---just refusing to sign it. All the rest was on the cops heads--showing HUGE bad judement by both the officer and his supervisor. I hope she sues the hell out of them and that she gets a huge settlement.

21 posted on 05/10/2005 3:45:31 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Wonder Warthog

I tend to agree with you to some degree, but I still put this on her head.

She did two things wrong: She refused to sign. She resisted arrest. This sort of thing reaches critical mass pretty quickly. The cops are like the Rain Man in the airport. Do what he says and everything is fine. Don't do it, and watch how fast things escalate.

The bulk of the responsibility is on her.


235 posted on 05/10/2005 11:44:28 AM PDT by RobRoy (Child support and maintenence (alimony) are what we used to call indentured slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson