Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 5Madman2; Beelzebubba
You are speaking from what is an obvious anti-police bias.

"anti police bias"? - NO - its a level of concern that arises when innocents are tazed for refusing to sign incriminating declarations. This was further compunded when they dry fired the prod to intimidate her into submission. Sorry Kojak - thats not bias - thats LIBERTY

I do not consider myself or the officers I work with as a road tax collector.

well - without putting too fine a point on it - when youre enforcing arbitrarily established speed zones, you are generating revenue for the Town or State.

If you knew anything about criminal or traffic law, you would know that taking offenders before the judge is so that the Judge can read the charge and further explain the violators rights.

so now theyre "violators" even before trial?

One of the those silly little Constitutional protections you seem so hot on.

so minimizing his concern is cause for sarcasm ?

Thank you for your input. I have given it the consideration it deserves

merely reinforcing the notion that a majority of law enforcement types have the attitude that they (as a arm of the government) know better than the average civi

171 posted on 05/10/2005 10:32:57 AM PDT by Revelation 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]


To: Revelation 911; Beelzebubba

I like to say it's been nice talking to both of you.

Yes, I'd really like to.

Goodbye


263 posted on 05/10/2005 12:05:31 PM PDT by 5Madman2 (DemocRATS are Vermin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson