Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Matchett-PI

"....... Pope John Paul II, in a General Audience on 24 January 1986, addressed the issue and said that "The theory of natural evolution, understood in a sense that does not exclude divine causality, is not in principle opposed to the truth about the creation of the visible world, as presented in the Book of Genesis."

Now that is silly. Evolution IS in principle opposed to the truth about creation of the visible world, as presented in the book of Genesis. Why? Because evolution cannot explain how creation came to be. I have no doubt that evolution can happen in the sense that people can become larger by eating better food and so forth. But evolution has no answer for the creation itself. This came from God, as Genesis duly notes.


625 posted on 05/12/2005 9:22:28 PM PDT by DennisR (Look around - there are countless observable clues that God exists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 623 | View Replies ]


To: DennisR
"..evolution has no answer for the creation itself."

I don't agree with theistic macroevolutionists any more than I agree with atheistic macroevolutionists.

Theological Problems of Theistic Evolution

626 posted on 05/12/2005 9:43:11 PM PDT by Matchett-PI (Macroevolution "is the last of the great 19th century mystery religions" ~ Berlinski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 625 | View Replies ]

To: DennisR
Now that is silly. Evolution IS in principle opposed to the truth about creation of the visible world,

Nonsense.

Why? Because evolution cannot explain how creation came to be

Nonsense on stilts. Not being inclined to have an opinion about something in no manner demonstrates that you are opposed to or in favor of it. Science is neutral on the subject of divine intervention. For aught science can say about it, now or ever, divine intervention may be guiding every sperm to it's divinely pre-ordained egg by physically indetectable, supernatural means. Science confines itself to opinions about what can be physically detected.

632 posted on 05/13/2005 4:02:44 PM PDT by donh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 625 | View Replies ]

To: DennisR
Now that is silly. Evolution IS in principle opposed to the truth about creation of the visible world,

Nonsense.

Why? Because evolution cannot explain how creation came to be

Nonsense on stilts. Not being inclined to have an opinion about something in no manner demonstrates that you are opposed to or in favor of it. Science is neutral on the subject of divine intervention. For aught science can say about it, now or ever, divine intervention may be guiding every sperm to it's divinely pre-ordained egg by physically indetectable, supernatural means. Science confines itself to opinions about what can be physically detected.

633 posted on 05/13/2005 4:03:56 PM PDT by donh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 625 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson