That's a real nice way of saying you couldn't care less for what I think. Well, thanks. If I hadn't of cared what you thought I wouldn't have taken the time to write to you.
Sorry, in an adversarial mode.. i.e. the flipantancy..
Rarely do I get this deep into a Evo, Creationist, bruhaha..
I've never met in college(many years ago) or after, a die hard Evo that made any sense.. but I've met a few Creationists that had a few good points IMO.. and I'm not brain washed by either of the dogmas..
I see it kind of like the Abortion, No-Abortion people.. They both have some good points with neither having the last word on a big issue, sactity of life.. Their way or the highway both of them..
Pretty much that way with Evos and Non-Evos too.. Each trying to pull the rug out of the others base arguments..
So going with the lesser of two evils I choose the non-abortionists and creationists.. because they at least listen to the others arguments before they reject them out of hand.. Not that they are so smart themselves but that they are not so dumb to purchase an unproveable dictum, "There is no God".. and that "life" is a purely mechanical process.. I'm not convinced of that..
When 13 years old I knew socialism was a parasitical system of parasites and host then, and if there was not a God, then there ought to be.. If so, then creating one is not a bad idea.. if only to make inalienable rights possible.. and dialectic materialism a parasitic social disease..